Administrative Law, Administrative Review and Litigation Knowledge Map
A Chinese-language PDF study reference linking administrative acts, procedure, time limits, administrative review, litigation and relief routes through a fact-to-remedy case map.
What this administrative-law reference covers
This Chinese-language PDF connects administrative acts, procedural steps, time limits, administrative review, litigation and other remedies. It is organized around five questions: who acted, what legal effect followed, whether the process was complete, how the period runs and which remedy fits the request.
The English page is a searchable summary and study guide. The indexed file remains in Chinese with legal examples; use it for examination and knowledge review alongside current rules and professional analysis for real disputes.
A subject-to-remedy workflow
Mark the authority, affected party, interested party and delegated actor. Classify the act, build a timeline for making, service, application, review and filing, then check review prerequisites, jurisdiction, admissible scope and deadlines before selecting a route.
File and scope note
The indexed file is a 404.13 KB PDF. It is a study map rather than a conclusion for a specific administrative dispute. Content review date: 2026-08-23.
Save to your cloud drive
Save the complete collection first so files remain together and are easier to access across devices.
Quark Cloud Drive
RecommendedSave Administrative Law, Administrative Review and Litigation Knowledge Map to this cloud drive
Baidu Netdisk
Save Administrative Law, Administrative Review and Litigation Knowledge Map to this cloud drive
Administrative-law case and remedy study guide
Turn an administrative case into a subject map, act classification, deadline timeline and remedy analysis before writing a conclusion.
Before you start
- Have a PDF reader and a timeline table for administrative cases.
- Know basic terms for authorities, administrative acts, procedure and periods.
- Keep study notes separate from advice about a real dispute and check current rules.
Quick start
- 01
Map the actors
Record the authority, affected party, interested party and delegated actor, and distinguish the maker from the executor.
- 02
Classify the act
Note the object, legal effect, coercive character and contestable scope so a factual act is not confused with a decision.
- 03
Draw the deadline timeline
Place making, service, application, review decision and filing dates on one line, then check the starting point and interruption rules.
- 04
Select the remedy route
Match the act type and requested outcome with review, litigation or another route, and record prerequisites and time limits.
Usage tips
- Classify the actor and act before discussing procedure and relief.
- Record the starting point, service method and statutory period in deadline questions.
- Recheck statutes, interpretations and examination outlines by their current version date.
Troubleshooting and uninstall
How can I distinguish an administrative act from a private-law act?
Check the actor, source of authority and legal effect, then ask whether a unilateral public-law power produced the result.
I am unsure between review and litigation. What should I compare?
Mark the act type and requested outcome first, then check admissible scope, any review prerequisite and the filing deadline.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main line for an administrative-law case?
Build a timeline around actor, act, procedure, deadline and remedy, then check whether the request fits the admissible scope.
Why are dates especially important in administrative cases?
Application, service, review and filing periods can determine whether a remedy proceeds, so missing a date can change the analysis.
Is administrative review or litigation chosen by preference?
The route depends on act type, admissible scope, any review prerequisite and the applicable deadline.
What format and size is the file?
The indexed resource is a 404.13 KB PDF; verify the filename and size after downloading.